Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2008/03/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Another ZM lens on the horizon
From: red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone)
Date: Tue Mar 25 11:46:46 2008
References: <aed41d690803240720h7726b157l333e19dba1b4d6e6@mail.gmail.com> <47E77CEE.825.749B80@leica.rcmckee.com> <9b678e0803250604t3a899eacx5c27a55a470093f4@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.GSO.4.62.0803251420230.29952@duke.poly.edu>
Put $$$ in your pocket......
I was trying to decide between the 2 lenses. At first, I wanted the
faster lens..... then Henning reported the superior performance of the 4.5,
and the additional weight and size of the 2.8, That swung me over to the
4.5.
Now if someone will please sell a used one at a cost that is reasonable, I
am all set...... Ebay has not cooperated on this one......
Frank Filippone
red735i@earthlink.net
Just curious, other than distortion, what can the 21/4.5 do that the 2.8
cannot do equally well at the same aperture?
In reply to:
Message from jsmith342 at gmail.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] Another ZM lens on the horizon)
Message from leica at rcmckee.com (R. Clayton McKee) ([Leica] Another ZM lens on the horizon)
Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Another ZM lens on the horizon)
Message from alal at duke.poly.edu (Akhil Lal) ([Leica] Another ZM lens on the horizon)