Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/03/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re:Another ZM lens on the horizon
From: imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George)
Date: Tue Mar 25 13:21:58 2008
References: <C40ED2B9.99DD3%mark@rabinergroup.com>

24x36mm = 864 sq mm
15.8x23.6mm = 373 sq mm

2 x 373 = 746 sq mm

or 118 sq mm less than 864 sq mm

which is why L X W (area) matters

Fond regards,
George
george@imagist.com
www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
Picture A Week - www.imagist.com/paw_07



On Mar 25, 2008, at 3:03 PM, Mark Rabiner wrote:
> I'm not a math guy I don't think in logarithms or multiples
> I think linier.
>
> The APS-C is
> 15.8 X 23.6mm
>
> Full frame would be
> 24 x 36mm
>
> the short side of full frame is the same size or bigger than the  
> long side
> of APS-C
>
>
> Or I think this pasted from my Apple Calc:
>
> 36 / 23.6 = 1.525


Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Re:Another ZM lens on the horizon)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Re:Another ZM lens on the horizon)