Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/03/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Geoge, This is how I also construed the small print, and I hate it for this reason http://uk.finance.yahoo.com/q?s=ADBE public is something I imagine completely different Amiti?s phx Lottermoser George wrote: > Well I don't know - it sounds like adobe is saying what ever you do > we'll consider it in our (public) domain and (potentially) use it as > if it were ours ( like folks using public domain stuff do). > > I'm not saying I like what they're doing ;~( > > Fond regards, > George > george@imagist.com > www.imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com/blog > Picture A Week - www.imagist.com/paw_07 > > > > On Mar 27, 2008, at 3:24 PM, Philippe AMARD wrote: > >> Public is not Adobe, so far as I know - I'd prefer the former, what >> do you think? >> phx >> >> >> Lottermoser George wrote: >> >>> In the case of Leonardo - pretty much in the public domain >>> >>> Fond regards, >>> George >>> george@imagist.com >>> www.imagist.com >>> http://www.imagist.com/blog >>> Picture A Week - www.imagist.com/paw_07 >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mar 27, 2008, at 3:08 PM, Philippe AMARD wrote: >>> >>>> Leonardo, Turner, Manet, Picasso, Hockney, where are you? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >