Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/04/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]This is a great and very thought provoking post. Technology is threatening many occupations. Artists have always had to struggle in becoming recognized, and this is another issue, but the working photographer is "suffering" what skilled medical typists and those in the recording industry are suffering. Medicine is no different. Newer techniques threaten the viability of practitioners whose skills become obsolete. Once, university training would set you up for life, but the rate of change is the issue. For me, the price is much more study, meetings and research to keep somewhat abreast with newer techniques, and for photographers, learning computer skills, photoshop techniques etc is now vital. You may save on film and development costs, but you will have to spend on hard/software and constant updates. The upsurge of DIY techniques with these powerful home computers means that many of us now publish our own books rather than employ type setters etc. Its a worldwide phenomena, which is not going to change soon. Henning also points out the secondary issue: loss of respect. Its real. I recently did a wedding for a friend. There were others at the wedding who carried "fancy" digital cameras and were happy to document the event. It was very difficult light. Harsh, backlit scenes, lowish light levels mixed with harsh direct sunlight, and coloured awnings changing colour balance. If my livilhood relied on it, I would have insisted on taking the wedding party away to a studio or more restricted setting for a series of "shots", but I had given them fair warning. In the end, they report that the whole family was astonished at how different my images were to others on the day. Lack of flare, improved colour rendition, better "focus", yet the intitial comments were laced with "those leicas must be fantastic", ie its not you, it must be the equipment. Well the Leicas are great, but most of the "differential" came down to controlling light with manual metering, and a lot of "darkroom" like work in "lightroom". I used white cards to keep the colour balance right in different areas (can't rely on the M8 ;-) ) and I have a better than average understanding of lightroom, which in large part I attribute to years of darkroom work. I was happy with the results. I probably robbed some photographer of a job for the day, though, I stressed to the family that they should have a professional as well, but they took the "punt". To make matters worse, the son was married 2 weeks later in Sydney and employed a $5k photographer, who has failed to "deliver" the goods weeks later. That family is not impressed. For all of us, renewing our approach to work, and being reactive to changes in working environments will continue to be important. Its much tougher, but its also more interesting in some ways and success will reward those who embrace it, just as Henning has done. I do long for a simple stack of chest x rays sometimes though :-( Cheers --- henningw@archiphoto.com wrote: From: Henning Wulff <henningw@archiphoto.com> To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org> Subject: [Leica] Selling photos, was; Selling gear Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 15:37:28 -0700 When I started getting serious about making money at photography in the early 70's, as opposed to the rather amateurish approach I had to stuff I sold in the 60's (which was stage and portraiture), I set out to find out what competition I had in my field. As I intended to do mainly editorial, corporate and architectural photography at that time, I quickly realized that while there was a fair bit of competition at all quality and price points for editorial and corporate photography, there was very little in some areas of architectural and construction photography, especially at the higher end. I never did do reportage. I also abandoned editorial photography and only did occasional corporate photography when it dovetailed well with the architectural/construction photography. In any case, when I started there was only one really good architectural photographer living in Vancouver, and there were certain things he wasn't interested in. I started by doing some of the things he didn't care for, and also got some equipment he didn't have, and was able to set my prices as I saw fit right from the start. This worked very well, and within a couple of years I was able to compete with him on anything, but preferred those areas where there wasn't any competition as those paid better :-). In the next 20-25 years I was able to continue in the field and earn good money mostly by being the first in the area to offer new services as they evolved, and do things that others didn't want to. For instance, I have no particular fear of heights and love climbing around on large construction projects, and that is a great asset for construction photography. For over 20 years, until the safety standards largely prevented such photography, I was the only one in Vancouver who would haul medium and large format gear around slip forms 500 feet off the ground or work from the end of tower crane booms when they were working. I set my own prices. When Photoshop came out, I was the only one who could do a good job of composites of architectural models and aerial photos, with correct perspective and lighting. Whenever something became impossible, impractical or the technology made it superfluous, I tried to find another niche. When, after about 5 years, some other people learned enough about perspective, Photoshop and could take decent aerial photos and charge 20% or less of what I did, I started doing other things. In the mid to late 90's things started changing rapidly, and almost all my advantages went away, so now I only do certain special jobs, and concentrate on my architectural business. I just couldn't make the sort of income I made from photography in the 80's anymore. Not anywhere close. The respect I used to get is also no longer there. The product has become devalued. I couldn't recommend that anyone now enter the areas of photography I've done. -- * Henning J. Wulff /|\ Wulff Photography & Design /###\ mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com |[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information