Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2008/04/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] In defence of the newspapers
From: imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George)
Date: Thu Apr 10 09:19:33 2008
References: <20080409203333.2B88ABA1@resin15.mta.everyone.net> <46182EEF-D51F-4286-BB90-9BDF0C2FA07C@nathanfoto.com> <FDA45608-1F5A-4800-BAA4-FFB0DB7B1054@cox.net> <12C99550-66C5-44A5-AFFB-713CFD698973@nathanfoto.com>
<http://www.stateofthenewsmedia.org/2005/
narrative_newspapers_economics.asp?cat=4&media=2>
Fond regards,
George
george@imagist.com
www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
Picture A Week - www.imagist.com/paw_07
On Apr 10, 2008, at 12:18 AM, Nathan Wajsman wrote:
> The newspapers are businesses. Every business, when faced with
> changes in its environment that threaten its survival, will try to
> adjust to the new environment in order to survive. I am simply
> stating the real-life facts as seen from a typical newspaper
> management suite. I am not making more judgments here.
Replies:
Reply from nathan at nathanfoto.com (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] In defence of the newspapers)
Reply from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] In defence of the newspapers)
In reply to:
Message from afirkin at afirkin.com (Alastair Firkin) ([Leica] WAS: Selling gear NOW: Free shooters. :-()
Message from nathan at nathanfoto.com (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] In defence of the newspapers)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] In defence of the newspapers)
Message from nathan at nathanfoto.com (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] In defence of the newspapers)