Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/04/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> The proof is in the pictures. I shot about 5000 > frames at 3 concerts. The hit rate is probably > around 1/20, for acceptable pictures. Would I > have done better with the D300? I doubt it. Would > I have loved to shoot at 1600 at times? I did, > and the RAW converted images are just fine. Heck, > I even shot at ISO2000 and 3200 for a few frames. > Do I love those Zuiko Digital glass? You betcha. > Edge to edge sharpness, same goes with the fisheye. > > We can argue until GB's cows come home about > which camera is the best, but unless you are > actually shooting pictures with them, then they are just the best > paperweight. Its not what you shoot its what they see. Its the edit. What do they see: prints? How big? A gallery? A website? What's the URL? If its not prints but uploads sensor size issues seem diminished. You could shoot the thing with a Leica Dlux 3. The perfect internet camera as far as I go. And you could make letter sized prints very nicely with its full sensor working at 16:9 format. You'd just get a lot of blank paper on long sides. Mark William Rabiner markrabiner.com