Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/04/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]It would end Vick Ko's buyer's remorse. Buying in the future would pretty much moot. That lens is so expensive, I don't think anyone has ever tested it. And I'll bet they didn't give one to B.D. gratis. ;-) wildlightphoto@earthlink.net wrote: >> The way to go if one wanted a long lens on a 4/3 camera would be >> Olympus' 300/2.8 (which translates to a 600/2.8 in 35mm terms). Pricey, >> but what a fast 600. >> > > Given the cost of the Oly 300/2.8 I'd say that this is one case where the > Leica 280/2.8 APO is a reasonable option! > > Doug Herr > Birdman of Sacramento > http://www.wildlightphoto.com > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > mail2web - Check your email from the web at > http://link.mail2web.com/mail2web > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >