Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/04/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Apr 19, 2008, at 7:46 AM, Leonard Taupier wrote: > Here is an example of a bird I have only seen in dense brush, and > rare at that. I would not remove the tangled brush as it would > change it's habitat. I watched this bird for 15 minutes and it never > came out of the brush, just flew from one bush to another. It's a > White Throated Sparrow. > > http://tinyurl.com/2uydoz if you wanted to use Photoshop to truly serve the bird...you would add dense brush, to make the bird less visible. Steve > > > Len > > > > On Apr 19, 2008, at 10:29 AM, wildlightphoto@earthlink.net wrote: > >> Mark Rabiner <mark@rabinergroup.com> wrote: >> >>> Doug! What kind of Photoshopping are we talking about here which >>> distorts >>> the truth of the bird and its habitat? >> >> If image editing removes the clutter of dense brush so that the >> bird appears to be in the open it's been moved from one habitat to >> another. Some birds will never be seen away from dense brush, some >> are typically open-country birds and would not be found in dense >> brush. In the case of the Cardinal, as Len explained, the bird may >> be found in either dense brush or singing in the open. >> >> Doug Herr >> Birdman of Sacramento >> http://www.wildlightphoto.com >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information best, Steve "I never wanted to be famous" http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/detail/186890