Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/04/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] F 5.6 and don't be there!
From: hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (Geoff Hopkinson)
Date: Mon Apr 21 17:24:51 2008
References: <380-220084121223448550@M2W031.mail2web.com><001001c8a40d$e45e1400$6b01a8c0@dadquad> <3F10F63E-F5C9-4599-A0A4-18CC38829601@comcast.net>

Very true indeed, and it appeals to me a great deal with the single
exception of the (understandable but prohibitive)price tag. 

Cheers
Geoff
http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman/e
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/gh/

-----Original Message-----
Subject: Re: [Leica] F 5.6 and don't be there!

Geoff,

Leica already has a 16mm f4. When you buy it they throw in an 18mm  
and 21mm for free.

Len


On Apr 21, 2008, at 8:14 PM, Geoff Hopkinson wrote:

> Doug, we were well overdue to have a Leica rumour thread anyway ;-)
> I don't doubt Dr Yao's connection and information. Heck I think  
> that he
> personally owns one of everything that Leica has ever produced as  
> well! At
> least it looks that way in Steve's users' gallery.
> The reason for my amazement if this new wunderlens appears is both how
> technically difficult it would be, if not near impossible, to  
> design and how
> much it would presumably cost.
> I don't know if Leica can afford the luxury of such a flagship item  
> either.
> As to my dream of a 16mm f4, I have no evidence what so ever, only  
> wishful
> thinking. That conjured from the new emphasis on more modestly  
> priced and
> apertured sphericals and the existence of the Zeiss Ikon competitor.
> Cheers
> Geoff
> http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman/e
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/gh/
>
> -----Original Message-----
> Subject: RE: [Leica] F 5.6 and don't be there!
>
> Geoff Hopkinson <hoppyman@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
>
>> I'll be stunned and amazed if Dr Yao's
>> prediction of a 50 f0.95 comes to pass!
>
> Given the problems focussing the current Noctilux on the M8 I  
> wouldn't be
> at all surprised if the rumored f/0.95 lens, if it turns into  
> reality, has
> zero focus shift problems.
>
> Doug Herr
> Sacramento
> http://www.wildlightphoto.com
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> myhosting.com - Premium MicrosoftR WindowsR and Linux web and  
> application
> hosting - http://link.myhosting.com/myhosting
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from len-1 at comcast.net (Leonard Taupier) ([Leica] F 5.6 and don't be there!)
In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (wildlightphoto@earthlink.net) ([Leica] F 5.6 and don't be there!)
Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] F 5.6 and don't be there!)
Message from len-1 at comcast.net (Leonard Taupier) ([Leica] F 5.6 and don't be there!)