Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/06/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] c
From: vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko)
Date: Mon Jun 2 09:02:15 2008
 
Thanks Jim

...Vick


>From: "Jim Nichols" <jhnichols@bellsouth.net>
>Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
>To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
>Subject: Re: [Leica] c
>Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 10:20:21 -0500
>
>Vick,
>
>I think that satisfaction or dissatisfaction with the Summarit 50 depends 
>on the particular specimen that you have.  I had one for several years and 
>it made some fine images, though a little soft wide open, but it was not in 
>good shape mechanically. The aperture click ball was worn, and I got tired 
>of trying to fix things and traded it for a Summitar.
>
>Some people find this to be a great lens. I suspect most specimens need a 
>CLA by now.
>
>Jim Nichols
>Tullahoma, TN USA
Replies: Reply from glehrer at san.rr.com (Jerry Lehrer) ([Leica] c)
 In reply to: Message from jhnichols at bellsouth.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] c)