Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/08/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Is Lightroom 2.0 Really Shipping?
From: john.o.newell at comcast.net (J. Newell)
Date: Sun Aug 17 10:19:32 2008

To me, the raw/jpg analogy is film/Polaroid.  Film you develop and print and 
have great ability to choose how the ultimate result comes out.  With a 
Polaroid, you got instant gratification but after-exposure options were 
limited.

Not perfect, but it works for me...

John Newell

-------------- Original message -------------- 
From: Tina Manley <images@comporium.net> 

> At 12:24 PM 8/17/2008, you wrote: 
> 
> >On Aug 17, 2008, at 8:18 AM, Frank Filippone wrote: 
> > 
> >>Steve: I have already been denigrated/chastised for that one..... 
> >>You gotta come up with new material...... 
> 
> RAW files are your negatives. Without RAW you are working from a 
> 3x5, already developed, drugstore print. If that's all you need, 
> that's fine. If you ever want to do your own developing or make 
> bigger prints, you'd better have a RAW file. 
> 
> Tina 
> 
> Tina Manley 
> www.tinamanley.com 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> Leica Users Group. 
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information