Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/09/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: camera shake was: Re: [Leica] a serious question
From: leica at rcmckee.com (R. Clayton McKee)
Date: Fri Sep 26 06:53:10 2008
References: <4268A9826B9DBE4D938B902A6BC8030888A4B1@exchange8.asc.local>, <4268A9826B9DBE4D938B902A6BC8030888A4B3@exchange8.asc.local>

Quoth the Kyle Cassidy :

> 
> is that not though the very nature of what IS lenses do? focus on
> the scene and hold it steady, ostensibly i guess, by picking points
> in the scene and moving the image (or the sensor) so that those
> points are always hitting the same place on the ccd during the
> length of the exposure?

Don't recall exactly how it does work (something about phase-shifting 
on the natural vibration) but the canon IS lenses work properly on 
the film EOS cameras, so that tech at least can't be dependent on 
holding steady on the sensor. 

Maybe there's something different in the Nikon / Olympus / otherguys 
approach.--


R. Clayton McKee                           http://www.rcmckee.com
Photojournalist                               rcmckee@rcmckee.com
P O Box 571900                           voice/fax   713/783-3502
Houston, TX 77257-1900                   cell phone #  on request


In reply to: Message from kcassidy at asc.upenn.edu (Kyle Cassidy) (camera shake was: Re: [Leica] a serious question)
Message from kcassidy at asc.upenn.edu (Kyle Cassidy) (camera shake was: Re: [Leica] a serious question)