Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/11/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] R10 news
From: red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone)
Date: Sun Nov 2 06:41:20 2008
References: <3cad89990811011853m38497b9fvc64d152e91f68f72@mail.gmail.com> <754139.25815.qm@web86706.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
 
Can you point to a technical discussion of why this is so?  I have only 
heard the Leica point of view.

It seems to me that if there were a good technical reason., others would 
fool the path... Hasselblad, and third party esoteric camera backs for MF 
and larger studio camera  included....

But Leica, in the M8 only, is the only believer....... 


Frank Filippone
red735i@earthlink.net


There is a perfectly sound technical reason for it to be better for the IR 
filter to be on "the other side" of the lens with rangefinder lenses.
Replies: Reply from frank.dernie at btinternet.com (FRANK DERNIE) ([Leica] R10 news)
Reply from hlritter at bex.net (Howard Ritter) ([Leica] Was: R10 news, now: the IR filter)
Reply from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] R10 news)
 In reply to: Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] R10 news)
Message from frank.dernie at btinternet.com (FRANK DERNIE) ([Leica] R10 news)