Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/11/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]If I had to choose between a 35 and 50 on a film M I'd choose the 35 However, I don't consider the them redundant If I had both (which I do) I'd carry them both (which I do) Fond regards, George george@imagist.com http://www.imagist.com http://www.imagist.com/blog http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist On Nov 30, 2008, at 7:55 PM, Philip Forrest wrote: > Disregarding brand and stripe (Leica vs. Canon vs. Nikon vs. Zeiss) if > you had to pick one lens for daily use on your rangefinder and it was > either a 35mm f/2.0 or a 50mm f/1.4 which would it be? (or digital > equivalent for y'all working in 1's and 0's) > I ask since they are both within the "normal" range for rangefinder > shooters and often a question we have to face. I hate carrying a > lot of > equipment and refuse to carry redundant equipment of which I consider > the 35 and 50mm lenses I own (excluding my DR Summicron). > Just throwing this out there to see the opinions which will come > through. > > Phil Forrest > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information