Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2008/12/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Bad news at Leica - worse than that
From: philippe.amard at tele2.fr (Philippe AMARD)
Date: Sun Dec 7 13:50:18 2008
References: <200812071106.mB7B5vSw034467@server1.waverley.reid.org> <BLU121-DS64114E3BADBD34E136738D4FC0@phx.gbl> <493C3D74.8010802@tele2.fr> <B1F97A20-7295-4639-B4C3-D95B99B3807E@mac.com>
Lottermoser George wrote:
> I certainly don't feel betrayed.
>
George - you're among the rare/exclusive/so few (officially 5000, minus
those who had faulty never replaced gear) lucky DMR owners.
Do you really think this matches the potential of R users?
This is where R users have been betrayed.
Plus the delay for a replacement R9.2 Diesel.
I am not referring to the quality of the DMR as such, and your
photographs, Doug's and others prove it everyday.
The rest of us have been simply ignored.
Typisch Leica!
Bien amicalement
Philippe
>
Replies:
Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] Bad news at Leica - worse than that)
Reply from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Bad news at Leica - worse than that)
In reply to:
Message from leicar at q.com (Aram Langhans) ([Leica] Bad news at Leica)
Message from philippe.amard at tele2.fr (Philippe AMARD) ([Leica] Bad news at Leica - worse than that)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] Bad news at Leica - worse than that)