Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/12/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I have an intuitive feeling that you're negatives are very dense some combination of overexposure and/or overdevelopment Fond regards, George george@imagist.com http://www.imagist.com http://www.imagist.com/blog http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist On Dec 8, 2008, at 2:05 PM, Yama Nawabi wrote: > already explained the problem in the description of my flickr > photos, so please click the following links for the problem: > > http://flickr.com/photos/helloyama/3093611810/ > http://flickr.com/photos/helloyama/3092808595/ > http://flickr.com/photos/helloyama/3093649582/ > > > trying to get tones that look more like this: > http://bp2.blogger.com/_hrIwoHYnxgA/R58lE07mgiI/AAAAAAAAE-4/ > hQFaLCM3FW0/s1600-h/IMG11757s.jpg > http://bp2.blogger.com/_hrIwoHYnxgA/R58lc07mgpI/AAAAAAAAE_w/ > lwghJ3RXF_k/s1600-h/IMG11751s.jpg > http://bp2.blogger.com/_hrIwoHYnxgA/R58jV07mgLI/AAAAAAAAE8A/ > TIIoNF6WWxw/s1600-h/IMG11797s.jpg > > he doesnt photoshop, or anything. i've even been using his times, > agitation, and scanning method. everything is the same, yet my negs > are ****ty and his ain't. anyone got any hints? > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information