Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/12/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]So do I for the M3 - the coverage is roughly what you can see through the viewfinder of a M3 - you might not even need the eyes (I dont use it) - its a perfectly acceptable lens. Cheers Jayanand On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 5:24 AM, Lawrence Zeitlin <lrzeitlin@optonline.net>wrote: > > On Dec 10, 2008, at 5:51 PM, Len wrote: > > After you >> mentioned the 2.8 Summaron I went searching the web for it. Yup it's >> gotten up there in price. >> > > > Len, > > You might try looking for an f3.5 Summaron. As I understand it, the F2.8 > Summaron is identical to the F3.5 model with the diaphragm adjusted to open > half a stop wider. The price might be a bit lower if you don't need that > extra half stop. I have one of these with the eyeglass finder for the M3 > and > it has been quite satisfactory. > > Larry Z > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >