Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/12/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Quality (was un-believable)
From: rmcclure2 at woh.rr.com (rob mcclure)
Date: Sat Dec 20 08:39:51 2008
References: <C571F947.46C4F%mark@rabinergroup.com> <818DA469-3DE6-49D3-8596-E0D538DA279E@mac.com> <a3f189160812200737k6a677a81jebc064dd84f23722@mail.gmail.com> <4CEF8D73-2513-4D73-A418-0CCC02BFE54E@woh.rr.com> <4B547AB0-B48A-4D9F-8099-0C672500728B@mac.com>

Thanks George.  I have to admit I'm starting to lust for an m8 now  
price on keh.com is below 3,000.  Drops below 2,000 and i'm there.

Rob
On Dec 20, 2008, at 11:08 AM, Lottermoser George wrote:

> 3 mm doesn't feel like "much thicker" in my hands.
> The M8 is, overall, smaller and lighter
> than my M6TTL with new motor;
> which was my main camera - pre-digital.
> Differences exist - but the "feel"
> is as close as one could hope for.
> Still makes for the smallest
> high quality kit available.
>
> Fond regards,
> George
>
> george@imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com/blog
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>
>
>
> On Dec 20, 2008, at 9:46 AM, rob mcclure wrote:
>
>> It is much thicker than film M's.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] un-believable)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] Quality (was un-believable))
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] Quality (was un-believable))
Message from rmcclure2 at woh.rr.com (rob mcclure) ([Leica] Quality (was un-believable))
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] Quality (was un-believable))