Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/12/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Before I get jumped on for overstating "potential quality." I totally get that not everyone needs (or can afford) the highest possible image quality to achieve their photographic goals. I also know full well that the highest image quality gear in the world will not necessarily capture the soulful image. Fond regards, George george@imagist.com http://www.imagist.com http://www.imagist.com/blog http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist On Dec 22, 2008, at 11:50 AM, Lottermoser George wrote: > As far as I'm concerned > there will always be a "Professional NEED" > for extra image quality. > > Always has been. > Always will be. > > That's why > Schneider and Rodenstock > make "digital" lenses > Hasselbald, Sinar, Leaf, Phase1, Immacon and Better Light > make "digital" backs > Linhof, Sinar, Alpa, and Cambo > make cameras > Adobe and everybody else > makes software > > Fond regards, > George > > george@imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com/blog > http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist > > > > On Dec 22, 2008, at 10:17 AM, red735i@earthlink.net wrote: > >> We have not been able to establish that there is a Professional >> NEED for the extra image quality > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information