Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/12/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Robert, For 35mm you will do fine with the Nikon. I suggest using the supplied Nikon software to see if it will fit your needs. For me it works fine. I also have Silverfast for my LF scanner, and it is excellent. Be prepared to spend some time. An 8x or 16x sampling 14-bit 35mm image takes a while at full resolution, and is around a 100mb file. If you are printing smaller sizes or for the web, then things will speed up. If I have an image worth saving, I tend to scan at the highest settings - then I can print full-size or downsize, just scanning once. I have had VueScan since it was introduced, but for some reason haven't been able to make it work for me. Good luck. Ken > -----Original Message----- > From: lug-bounces+kcarney1=cox.net@leica-users.org [mailto:lug- > bounces+kcarney1=cox.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of > rclark01@comcast.net > Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2008 9:03 PM > To: Leica Users Group > Subject: [Leica] Film Scanner Suggestion > > I'm interesting in purchasing a film scanner. I've looked at the Nikons > and they get good reviews but my knowledge of film scanners is limited. > I'm interested in a good one to begin digitizing my over 20 years of > negatives and slides. While the Coolscan 5000 is not out of my price > range, I'm wondering about other scanners that LUGGERS have used and are > still using. > > Thanks, > Robert Clark > Lancaster, PA > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information