Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/12/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Well I moved from the 4000 to the 5000 and I found it to be a huge improvement. As did several other photographers who did so. Mark William Rabiner > From: Richard Man <richard.lists@gmail.com> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org> > Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 14:29:21 -0800 > To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org> > Subject: Re: [Leica] Film Scanner Suggestion > > Well, I kept my LS-4000 as the -5000 is not that great an improvement. When > I looked for a scanner for the XPan, I opted for the cheaper LS-8000 > instead > of the LS-9000. Both are still churning away just fine. > > Scanner technology does not make leaps like the digital cameras do. The CCD > is scanned one pixel line at a time, and the LS-4000/5000/8000/9000 etc. > are > probably the best they can do given the price range. > > On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 2:11 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark@rabinergroup.com> > wrote: > >> Slightly confuses the issue though as people as in everyone I ever knew >> moved up from the 4000 to the 5000 five years ago. >> >> > > -- > // richard m: richard @imagecraft.com > // b: http://rfman.wordpress.com > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information