Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/12/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Film Scanner Suggestion
From: pjleeson at mchsi.com (Philip Leeson)
Date: Sat Dec 27 15:03:50 2008
References: <23A7D1E76319444BA96F159496DDF4BB@dadquad> <C57B4CBF.47294%mark@rabinergroup.com> <734A5221B8C748978BBF77A073566F7F@dadquad> <974CC2F9-1381-46AA-9A5D-18F1A50FA5A6@verizon.net> <139E451B-40CE-4AB3-8699-858AA40C30E6@gmail.com>
 
Buy the 9000.
Only downsides are price,size, noise.
Phil
On Dec 27, 2008, at 4:01 PM, Diffraction Photography wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'm new to this list and don't mean to hijack this thread but it  
> seems relevant to my current dilemma.  I'm considering the Nikon  
> 5000ED and the 9000ED.   I shoot mostly 35mm but I also shoot 120  
> film so one would think the choice would be simple.  I've read a lot  
> of reviews and comparisons and I have asked many opinions but I'm  
> still stuck as I would only like to purchase 1 scanner, not 2.   
> Ultimately I am wondering about the experiences of people here with  
> the inconveniences, quality and effienciency of scanning 35mm film  
> w/ the 9000ED vs using the 5000ED.  I don't plan on buying the multi- 
> roll feeder.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
In reply to: Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Film Scanner Suggestion)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Film Scanner Suggestion)
Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Film Scanner Suggestion)
Message from len-001 at verizon.net (Leonard Taupier) ([Leica] Film Scanner Suggestion)
Message from diffraction.ca at gmail.com (Diffraction Photography) ([Leica] Film Scanner Suggestion)