Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/12/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Polaroid, requiescat in pace
From: jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols)
Date: Tue Dec 30 18:11:02 2008
References: <C57F4E6B.474BC%mark@rabinergroup.com><EF7B771BCA3E42F5B48B9EF0A437B323@jimnichols> <495AC84B.6070104@san.rr.com>

Jerry,

Read further down, and you can answer your own question.

Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jerry Lehrer" <glehrer@san.rr.com>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2008 7:18 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Polaroid, requiescat in pace


> Jim,
>
> What idiot on the LUG made that question?
>
>    "Few people really ever owned a Polaroid"
>
> It seems that almost everyone I know had and used a Polaroid in all of its 
> iterations.
>
> Jerry.
>
>
> Jim Nichols wrote:
>> Mark,
>>
>> I owned a Polaroid SX-70, purchased as a gift for my wife. Photos that 
>> were good to start with are good today.  I also took a lot that were 
>> forgettable, as well.
>>
>> The shorescape below was captured in 1978, and scanned today.  With a 
>> slight cleanup in Elements 6.0, it is still presentable as a web image.
>>
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Gulf+Shores+AL+1978.jpg.html
>>
>> Jim Nichols
>> Tullahoma, TN USA
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Rabiner" <mark@rabinergroup.com>
>> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2008 3:04 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Polaroid, requiescat in pace
>>
>>
>>> Few people really ever owned a Polaroid.
>>>
>>> I'd like to see the stats on how much Polaroid photography was done by
>>> amateurs vs. Leica.
>>>
>>> Mark William Rabiner
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> From: Jerry Lehrer <glehrer@san.rr.com>
>>>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
>>>> Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 19:50:32 -0800
>>>> To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
>>>> Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Polaroid, requiescat in pace
>>>>
>>>> Larry and Rei,
>>>>
>>>> No!  They would not prepare the same sort of EULOGY, because Polaroid
>>>> had far more influence on
>>>> the hoi-poloi than did Leica.  Most people have never heard of 
>>>> Leitz/Leica.
>>>>
>>>> They will die "not with a bang, but a whimper".
>>>>
>>>> Jerry
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Rei Shinozuka wrote:
>>>>> another one of the nifty fifty bites the dust:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nifty_Fifty
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Dec28 10:44, Lawrence Zeitlin wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Read the lyrical and nostalgic account of the passing of Polaroid in
>>>>>> today's New York Times.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/28/weekinreview/28kimmelman.html?hp
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I wonder if some editorial writer is preparing the same sort of elegy
>>>>>> for Leica?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Larry Z
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> 



In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Re: Polaroid, requiescat in pace)
Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] Re: Polaroid, requiescat in pace)
Message from glehrer at san.rr.com (Jerry Lehrer) ([Leica] Re: Polaroid, requiescat in pace)