Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/01/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Here is another vote for Neopan 1600. I used it for many of the nighttime shots in Seville in 2003-4. When I did my own developing, I used XTOL 1+1, but later, after moving from Switzerland to the Netherlands in the summer of 2003, I just let a pro lab in Amsterdam develop my films, and they use a Fuji developer of some sort for everything. No matter, Neopan 1600 still gave me better results than eithe TMZ or Ilford Delta 3200. Nathan Nathan Wajsman Alicante, Spain http://www.frozenlight.eu http://www.greatpix.eu http://www.nathanfoto.com Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0 PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog On Jan 12, 2009, at 2:39 AM, David Keenan wrote: > Are are the opinions out there for Neopan 1600? > > I have some Diafine and Xtol on order. Have plenty on D-76 on hand. > > I tried a roll of 1600 in D-76 1:1 last weekend and it looked okay > -- but > always looking for the better mousetrap. > > Tri-X and Diafine sounds pretty interesting. And no one seems to > dislike > Xtol. > > My development is also destined to be scanned. > > Dave. > > -- > 2009 PAW Gallery: www.david-keenan.com/paw > Web Site: www.david-keenan.com > Austin Center for Photography: www.visitacp.org -- Check it out!!! > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information