Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/01/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] A REAL LEICA OR A COUNTERFEIT?
From: sethrosner at nycap.rr.com (Seth Rosner)
Date: Mon Jan 12 05:03:58 2009
References: <6AF5A1EA-1953-41B2-AF9F-E5C4AACDEF1F@mac.com> <496A6CBF.9080003@san.rr.com> <a3f189160901111509y1adc51d3oc6d5e35b38d7c11a@mail.gmail.com> <496A8207.7070204@san.rr.com><a3f189160901111543j3bf78643p33303526d514ede2@mail.gmail.com> <496A8A80.9070800@san.rr.com>

Jerry, at $200. you overpaid very badly  :-(   !!! As I think I wrote last 
week, in 1948 I bought a Leica IIIa with f/2 Summar for, I think, $25. Yes, 
it was an 'inside' deal, from my dad.    :-)

Someone on the list will tell us exactly what 200 1946 dollars are worth 
today. Here's some guide: in 1950, a brand-new 2-bedroom home in Levittown 
Long Island NY could be bought for $9,995. So you probably have to multiply 
by at least 20.

Seth

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jerry Lehrer" <glehrer@san.rr.com>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2009 7:10 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] A REAL LEICA OR A COUNTERFEIT?


> Sonny,
>
> I did very well by the 1936 Berlin Olympics.  The father of a close
> friend bought a Leica IIIa
> with 50mm Elmar there.  He hardly used it, so I bought it from his son,
> in 1946, for the sum
> of $200. The son was a classmate of mine at the Bronx High School of
> Science. I was 17 at
> the time. (I wonder what  1946 year $200 would be in 2009 year dollars?
> =-O )
>
> Much later he sold me a 90mm Thambar NIB.
>
> Jerry
>
>
> Sonny Carter wrote:
>> The nick name is Sonny.  I understand that, but you barged into the
>> room castigating people, without reading all the thread, not even the
>> next few messages.
>>
>> BTW, how did you do at the 1936 Olympics?
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Jerry Lehrer <glehrer@san.rr.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Sunny,
>>>
>>> I really don't spend all my time at the computer looking at  LUG e-Mail.
>>>
>>> Jerry
>>>
>>>
>>> Sonny Carter wrote:
>>>
>>>> Late to the table as usual, Jerry.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Jerry Lehrer <glehrer@san.rr.com> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Robert and Ted
>>>>>
>>>>> Don't any of you people realise that the 1936 Olympics were held in
>>>>> BERLIN,
>>>>> not Munich?
>>>>>
>>>>> Jerry
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Robert Rose wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ted,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dennis Laney's book "Leica Collectors Guide" has an extensive listing 
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> serial numbers that might help.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Serial number 10606 should correspond to a 1928 Leica I.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The 1936 serial numbers range from around 183000 to 217500.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Maybe the embossed cameras were a special edition with a different
>>>>>> serial
>>>>>> number range?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hope that helps.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bob Rose
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Message: 19
>>>>>> Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 21:16:07 -0800
>>>>>> From: "Ted Grant" <tedgrant@shaw.ca>
>>>>>> Subject: [Leica] A REAL LEICA OR A COUNTERFIT?
>>>>>> To: "'Leica Users Group'" <lug@leica-users.org>
>>>>>> Message-ID: <79pc8o$1r6qik@pd6mo1no-svcs.prod.shaw.ca>
>>>>>> Content-Type: text/plain;    charset="US-ASCII"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi crew,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This note with a question from my son Scott this evening:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Scott asked:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I was over at a friends place tonight and he has an old Leica that 
>>>>>>>> he
>>>>>>>> had
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> bought off this old Russian guy a couple of years back, on the top of
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> camera it has embossed 1936 Munich Olympic, has the German bird crest
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> the serial number 10606.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The question is, do you know anyone in the LUG that may be able to 
>>>>>> tell
>>>>>> or
>>>>>> trace the serial number and find out if it's the real deal or a knock
>>>>>> off.
>>>>>> The camera is in really good shape. <<<<<,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There you go folks that's the question.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I looked in a few real old Leica books but couldn't find any serial
>>>>>> number
>>>>>> information.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.6/1888 - Release Date: 1/12/2009 
7:04 AM


In reply to: Message from robert.rose at mac.com (Robert Rose) ([Leica] A REAL LEICA OR A COUNTERFEIT?)
Message from glehrer at san.rr.com (Jerry Lehrer) ([Leica] A REAL LEICA OR A COUNTERFEIT?)
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] A REAL LEICA OR A COUNTERFEIT?)
Message from glehrer at san.rr.com (Jerry Lehrer) ([Leica] A REAL LEICA OR A COUNTERFEIT?)
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] A REAL LEICA OR A COUNTERFEIT?)
Message from glehrer at san.rr.com (Jerry Lehrer) ([Leica] A REAL LEICA OR A COUNTERFEIT?)