Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/01/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] FILM VS DIGITAL! ???
From: afirkin at afirkin.com (Alastair Firkin)
Date: Mon Jan 12 17:58:09 2009

Interesting comments. I hope we will hear some more as the experiment 
continues. I should look at scanned neg prints some time. I have always 
taken them out to the darkroom and been very happy with the results. I 
reckon I could also do them just as fast when you take all the scanning time 
into account.

Cheers

Alastair

--- tedgrant@shaw.ca wrote:

From: "Ted Grant" <tedgrant@shaw.ca>
To: "'Leica Users Group'" <lug@leica-users.org>
Subject: [Leica] FILM VS DIGITAL! ???
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 16:40:00 -0800

Hi Crew,

I've just taken a break from scanning roughly 250 35mm TMY negatives rated
at ASA 800 from one of my medical books. And making 13 X 19 size prints for
an exhibition.

 

A very interesting project even though I've scanned lots of slides and B&W
negs in the past this episode is an eye opener to say the least.

 

If I were to say ."shooting digital is an idiots way of photography" it
would be ridiculous. It isn't! It's just a different fashion of recording
our images. Is it better? NOPE!!! Certainly not when you look at these
prints from film! Actually never thought I'd say or admit something like
this.

 

But they are different, basically it comes down to this, "To each his own!"
There's no point knocking ones brains out comparing and trying to say one is
better than the other. Because quite frankly right now I'd have no problem
saying, "digital just doesn't cut it like film!" But that would be
ridiculous, as I have 13 X 19 prints from digital images that would knock
yer socks off.

 

But there surely is a difference when you see these prints because they look
better than wet tray prints and I always prided myself at being a pretty
good printer when the situation called for it! I'm using an EPSON 2200
printer with EPSON "Ultra Smooth Fine Art Paper" and they have the look and
feel of  well made wet tray prints.. only better! But it's got to be the
film that's making them look so cool! The Scanner is a "Polaroid Sprintscan"
film scanner. At 4000 dpi.

 

So for what it's worth if any are interested a kind of new discovery on my
part.

 

The plan is.. "Never shoot film and digital" on the same assignment and
expect to have identical looking print images! FWIW!!!!!!!!!!

 

Ol' doc ted :-) 


_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information