Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/01/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> I did locate the LFI discussion regarding > the non-linear > way the sensor information is compressed into its 8 bit form > before later > reconstruction. Can you point me to it, please? Thanks, Bob > -----Original Message----- > From: lug-bounces+leica=web-options.com@leica-users.org > [mailto:lug-bounces+leica=web-options.com@leica-users.org] On > Behalf Of Geoff Hopkinson > Sent: 20 January 2009 11:56 > To: Leica Users Group > Subject: Re: [Leica] DxO, the M8 and dynamic range > > Don, thanks for your input there. I don't recall that > discussion on the > sensor in detail. I have found the test site referred to by > Dante which is > very interesting. I did locate the LFI discussion regarding > the non-linear > way the sensor information is compressed into its 8 bit form > before later > reconstruction. I won't pursue this longer on the list. > Of course in all of this I was explaining a method that I > prefer rather than > expecting to convert anyone else. The majority of folks look to be > comfortable with the negative exposure adjustment method. > The whole area is a complex one and we each place different weight on > different attributes, I think. Noise in shadows being exacerbated by > under-exposure is a big issue for me. Sometimes too simple assumptions > regarding terminology differ too. For example 'over-exposure' > Methods as well. I use Auto exposure but try to meter > carefully and then > lock that reading and recompose (where practical and warranted). >