Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/01/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I have a 90 thin T-E that is recognized correctly about 75% of the time. I put it down to the location of the flange screws, but haven't investigated it further as coding of this lens is non-consequential in any case. At 9:02 AM -0500 1/22/09, Rei Shinozuka wrote: >i have an off-brand lens with LTM to M adapter (a voigtlander 28/1.9) >which of course is uncoded, and most image info shows up as 0mm (uncoded), >but i was surprised that a few (less than >10%) of the images i took with the M8 actually correctly recorded "28mm" >as the focal length. this seems to be a totally intermittent phenomenon, >sometimes a series of images will have 0mm, then one will say 28mm, then >more 0mm. > >i am mystified! > >does the m8 perhaps use the viewfinder selector to make a guess? i >recall sun tam exploring this possibility in an LHSA Viewfinder article. > >i'd be fascinated to hear if anyone else has seen this phenomenon? > >-rei -- * Henning J. Wulff /|\ Wulff Photography & Design /###\ mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com |[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com