Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/01/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] LUG mail responsiveness
From: hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson)
Date: Mon Jan 26 23:55:12 2009
References: <36172e5a0901262336j72061bf0re0150c8e8569d24a@mail.gmail.com> <c7c8cf880901262348g27edf98ej3b301ca8ce38c817@mail.gmail.com>

Thanks Pasvorn . You have seen it quckly then and I got your response
quickly.
I am not getting the original message back to myself. It must be something
about Gmail I am not understanding.
Sorry to bother everyone. I am seeing more notes from people testing  so I
wondered if there was a general LUG slowdown.

2009/1/27 Pasvorn Boonmark <pasvorn@boonmark.net>

> Geoff,
>
> I am not sure how long it took to display.  May be you can try to
> time-stamp your e-mail?
>
> Posted at 11:47pm PST.
>
> -Pasvorn
>
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 11:36 PM, Geoff Hopkinson <hopsternew@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I wonder if this is related to my Gmail or the LUG in general? My normal
> net
> > and other email progs seem unaffected by any delays.
> >
> > --
> > Cheers
> > Geoff
> > Breathe In, Breathe Out, Move On
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
Cheers
Geoff
Breathe In, Breathe Out, Move On

Replies: Reply from dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] LUG mail responsiveness)
Reply from richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] LUG mail responsiveness)
In reply to: Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] LUG mail responsiveness)
Message from pasvorn at boonmark.net (Pasvorn Boonmark) ([Leica] LUG mail responsiveness)