Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/01/31
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Philippe, Ah malin!, when some minutes ago I've mentionned the Angenieux I can't imagine this superb picture, the Angenieux lenses have a superb rendition, I think I've already mentionned that on the 80's I've tested the 90 Angenieux with the 90 R Summicron, fine details was better on Angenieux and his contrast was a little more smooth. Nevertheless on this set the second is my favorite. Concerning the Summicron flare ... I honestly think "tu es trop ?xigeant mon ami", some little imperfections are beautiful.... otherwise how you define the "Gamour"? Amiti?s Lluis El 31/01/2009, a las 8:45, Philippe AMARD escribi?: > Contre-jours: > > <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/album368/2009-Flare+o+the+cron-1080476.jpg.html > > > > L1 - Summicron 50 - better viewed large > > <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/album368/2009-Botanique-1080474.jpg.html > > > > L1 -Summicron 50 - > > <http://gallery.leica-users.org/d/151337-1/2009-Canal-Contre-jour-1080531.jpg > > > > L1 - Ang?nieux 70 x 3 at 210 - f 22 > > Comments and criticism welcome as usual > Bien cordialement de Metz > Phxyz > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information