Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/02/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] british protest
From: s.dimitrov at charter.net (Slobodan Dimitrov)
Date: Mon Feb 16 16:09:54 2009
References: <1440244624.11043861234821442810.JavaMail.root@mail02.pantherlink.uwm.edu>

That's a twist, England under Napoleonic law.
sd


On Feb 16, 2009, at 1:57 PM, Alan Magayne-Roshak wrote:

>> From the article:
>> "The Home Office added that anyone accused under the act could  
>> defend themselves by proving they had "a reasonable excuse" for  
>> taking the picture."
>
> This looks like the opposite of the "innocent until proven guilty"  
> concept; the accused has to prove his/her innocence rather then the  
> government
> proving them guilty!
>
>
> Alan
>
> Alan Magayne-Roshak, Senior Photographer
> UPAA POY 1978
> University Information Technology Services
> University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Alan+Magayne-Roshak/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from amr3 at uwm.edu (Alan Magayne-Roshak) ([Leica] british protest)