Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/02/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: LUG Digest, Vol 38, Issue 445
From: Jan.Decher at uvm.edu (Jan Decher)
Date: Tue Feb 17 07:50:12 2009
References: <200902170710.n1H7ADbV038977@server1.waverley.reid.org>

What's going on here??  Whenever my message is first on the Digest it  
gets clipped?
Jan

On Feb 17, 2009, at 2:10 AM, lug-request@leica-users.org wrote:

>
> Jan
>
>
> On Feb 16, 2009, at 10:00 PM, lug-request@leica-users.org wrote:
>> From: Geoff Hopkinson <hopsternew@gmail.com>
>> Date: February 16, 2009 9:51:41 PM EST
>> I recommend you get your hands on the LFI issue and read the complete
>> article for further comments by the Leica hierarchy. Fascinating to
>> me.
>>
>> The 'CL of digital' seems to have popular support on the internet
>> forums. It
>> certainly sounds like Leica are hinting in that direction. I don't
>> see what
>> you could remove from the M8 design to make it much simpler though.
>> If that
>> is so, you need a much cheaper to manufacture body with an M mount.
>> If that
>> means an EVF I think it would lose its rangefinder essence. I
>> wouldn't be
>> surprised at all to see a D system new body in conjunction with
>> Panasonic
>> ...Digilux 4?? with micro four thirds lenses?? Sound like you would
>> rather
>> see an 'M-Lux" !!!


Replies: Reply from reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid) ([Leica] Re: LUG Digest, Vol 38, Issue 445)