Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/03/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] LUG Age Distribution Chart from 2004
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:55:00 -0500
References: <17D17A073BA6420B99A530220E4EA6F5@jimnichols> <3A722AD6-7039-42C2-927D-588850E449F0@embarqmail.com>
 
I moved to the 60's column 3 years ago.

Regards,
George Lottermoser
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist

On Mar 16, 2009, at 5:00 PM, Ric Carter wrote:

> if I stay lucky, this part of the 50s bar moves right one bar this  
> year;^)
>
> ric carter
>
>
> On Mar 16, 2009, at 5:11 PM, Jim Nichols wrote:
>
>> This set me to thinking.  I don't propose a new survey but I  
>> wonder if the peak is drifting to the right?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
Replies: Reply from leowesson at gmail.com (leo wesson) ([Leica] LUG Age Distribution Chart from 2004)
 In reply to: Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] LUG Age Distribution Chart from 2004)
Message from ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] LUG Age Distribution Chart from 2004)