Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/03/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]For me the still frame approach he used with a $500 - $900 camera (current market price) including the device of the hearing impaired main character to get around the sound synch issues the film deserves credit totally on its own merits as an aesthetically pleasing well thought out and executed short film a lesson on what one can do with what one has as opposed to "Think of the work he could have avoided?" Yes. He could have made a totally different film with different equipment. as far as work - well the 5DII for video requires a good deal of other sorts of effort, including sound issues, viewing a framing issues; etc. Regards, George Lottermoser george at imagist.com http://www.imagist.com http://www.imagist.com/blog http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist On Mar 20, 2009, at 4:03 PM, F?elix L?opez de Maturana wrote: > Think of the work he could have avoided working with the Canon EOS > 5D MkII