Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/03/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Another Lumix zoom picture - why there are no Leica lenses for the Micro 4/3rds
From: luisripoll at telefonica.net (Lluis Ripoll)
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 00:19:49 +0100
References: <30186826.1237677329018.JavaMail.root@mswamui-chipeau.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
 
Well Doug, maybe...

I'm not an expert on digital, but on any case I was really impressed.  
Please could you explain this...? thank you.

Saludos cordiales

Lluis


El 22/03/2009, a las 0:15, Doug Herr escribi?:

> Lluis Ripoll wrote:
>
>>
>> I can only say that I'm attonished with the excellent quality!
>>
>
>> El 21/03/2009, a las 5:55, H&ECummer escribi?:
>>
>>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Howard+Cummer/Lumix+45+-+200+Zoom/EsBW.JPG.html
>>>
>>> http://tinyurl.com/ce2vdu
>>
>
> A web-sized jpg is not the best way to determine the quality of  
> output.
>
> Doug Herr
> Birdman of Sacramento
> http://www.wildlightphoto.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] Another Lumix zoom picture - why there are no Leica lenses for the Micro 4/3rds)