Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/04/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Indeed Frank. And it's a 9880, not 9800; different inks, different heads, different drop sizes, different (better IMO) prints. I had a 4000; liked it VERY much other than the clogs. I once took a print as wide as it could print (around 16.5") into my dealer along with the file and asked them if they would print it on the same type paper with one of the new HP's with a built in spectrophotometer. They did, and the only difference was a bit more sharpness because the drop size was smaller. They were very surprised. Then the 9880 and the 7880 went on sale. Epson was giving credit for having one of their printers, 3 or 4 free rolls of paper, etc. The 7880 max width is 24" (22 really with wiggle room borders). When you're printing squares that's really not very big when you have big scanned files. 44" is much better :-) With borders it's really 42. Many of my prints are right in the middle; about 34 - 38". The price per inch difference in cost is much less going from the 7880 to the 9880 than from the 4880 to the 7880. So that was my rationale (not that it took much for me to convince me). Besides, my son finished college so I put it in his room so he wouldn't be able to come back and live at home ;-) Best, Bob Bob Adler Palo Alto, CA http://www.raflexions.com ________________________________ From: Frank Filippone <red735i at earthlink.net> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2009 6:33:32 PM Subject: Re: [Leica] Another failure of Epson 3800 printer Bob... why the 9800? Big prints? I am looking to find if there is something else that would gravitate a buyer towards this big a printer...... Frank Filippone red735i at earthlink.net My 9880 is bug free. Amazing machine. Bob Adler _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information