Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/04/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]John - Stick with whatever suits you. ?Your photos shows awesome process control, so stick at it. ?Any of the Atomal formulae are expensive here. >So why Sodium Sulfite at 100 g/l and Oxyethyl-ortho-aminophenol? I would >think you could cut back to 40-50 grams/l which would increase actuance I >think. Unless the Sulfite also is needed as an accelerator for the >Oxyethyl-ortho-aminophenol, which is likely. The reduced sulfite would >also increase actuance by allowing the pyro to proportionally stain the >density. The sulfite is probably there to prevent oxidation of the 0-aminophenol, which isn't very stable. In my experience all benzene diols including catechol, pyro, hydroquinone and others stop staining at between 5 and 10 g/L sulfite. But both o-aminophenol and sulfite prevent staining. >The Sodium Metaphosphate is likely used to increase the rate of >hydroquinone developement and give maximum contrast. Metaphosphate is probably there to sequester divalent anions. >The potassium bromide here would then be a restrainer, which seems >unnecessary as the sodium metaphosphate isn't that caustic? Not as much as >Sodium Hydroxide at least. If fog is a problem then perhaps a less caustic >sodium would work. The restrainer is needed as this has an almost full load of sulfite and carbonate. >Interesting formula to play around with. I'll have to see if I can get >some of the aminophenol, and Sodium Metaphosphate, both not the usual fare. Yes, interesting - but I still think way too complicated. Marty