Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2009/04/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] IMG: Point of view? Candid? Casual?
From: ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter)
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 13:25:56 -0400
References: <18FED8A3-30EE-476C-BE02-E299D0269EE8@mac.com> <68061AB7370C42358C0D682D60C80E92@jimnichols> <006E3C14-F71D-4DB3-83AF-FC60C0A690F1@embarqmail.com> <DDC49F0B-414B-4217-B0FA-D673EA501B6F@mac.com>
I'll buy into either;^)
On Apr 23, 2009, at 1:03 PM, George Lottermoser wrote:
> concentrated amazement?
> or
> amazed concentration?
In reply to:
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] IMG: Point of view? Candid? Casual?)
Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] IMG: Point of view? Candid? Casual?)
Message from ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] IMG: Point of view? Candid? Casual?)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] IMG: Point of view? Candid? Casual?)