Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/04/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] G10
From: s.dimitrov at charter.net (Slobodan Dimitrov)
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 08:34:32 -0700
References: <0583B3CD-FCEC-410E-87B6-143026B0BDA2@charter.net> <32748BA4-69A4-44F9-8938-0F2FF18F24EC@comcast.net>

The only problem is that there is no tele with it.
I do a lot of head shots with a P/S.
S.d.


On Apr 28, 2009, at 8:12 AM, charcot wrote:

> Highly rec the Panasonic LX 3  - the leica version is more money  
> and I think you get less for it.
>
> ernie
> On Apr 28, 2009, at 8:15 AM, Slobodan Dimitrov wrote:
>
>> Took my G10 over to Canon, at Irvine, yesterday morning.
>> Apparently, it?s not very dust tight.
>> The sensor accumulated debris, which became very noticeable in the  
>> sky area.
>> Because it is a cleaning, it is not covered by the warranty.
>> Go figure!
>> It's on the edge of becoming the wife's camera.
>> Time to shop for another prosumer grade P/S for the camera bag.
>> S.d.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from s.dimitrov at charter.net (Slobodan Dimitrov) ([Leica] G10)
Message from charcot at comcast.net (charcot) ([Leica] G10)