Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/04/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]IMO, the G10 is OK for ISO 80 or maybe even 200. ACR seems better for the raw conversions than the Canon software. Not an available light camera. I keep mine (in a dustproof case) in my glove compartment for the times when you need any camera (like the PETA demonstration here the other day where the almost naked gal, a stone fox btw, had all the meat cuts drawn out in magic marker all over her bod...) Here is one, where I could just grab the camera. Something vaguely unsettling about it.. Ken http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/kcarney/IMG_0143.jpg.html > -----Original Message----- > From: lug-bounces+kcarney1=cox.net at leica-users.org [mailto:lug- > bounces+kcarney1=cox.net at leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Slobodan Dimitrov > Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 9:28 AM > To: Leica Users Group > Subject: Re: [Leica] G10 > > I flash fill when necessary, and I rarely take images > surreptitiously, so the low light function is not a concern. > The P/S needs to at least marginally match an APS-C made image in > reproduction. > I don't think we're there yet with the products that are out now. > For now, I'll wait for the next generation of P/S. > S.d. > > > On Apr 28, 2009, at 6:23 PM, Henning Wulff wrote: > > > The DMC G1 certainly provides better image quality than the G10 > > under any conditions, and the Fuji F200EX also does better.... > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information