Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/05/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Propensity to flare under barely extreme lighting conditions. I should add the 35mm 'Lux for that also. S. On May 10, 2009, at 9:14 AM, mehrdad wrote: > slobadan, what don't you like about the 50 summarit and is the tele- > elmarit > 90 the latest 90/2.8 ? > > On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Slobodan Dimitrov > <s.dimitrov at charter.net>wrote: > >> The worst are the 21mm S/A, the Tele-Elmarit 90mm, the 50mm >> Summarit, and >> the last lens you spent too much money for just to shoot flowers. >> S.d. >> >> >> >> On May 10, 2009, at 9:03 AM, Douglas Nygren wrote: >> >> What in your opinion are the best four M lenses and why? What are >> the four >>> worst? >>> >>> I thought it would be interesting to read how the luggers would >>> answer >>> these questions. >>> >>> I realize that best and worst are subjective. Subjective answers are >>> welcome as are so-called objective replies. Un-welcome is the >>> rhetoric that >>> all the M book writers employ. >>> >>> Which are the lenses to die for, which should check into the dog >>> pound, >>> and why, of course? >>> >>> Have fun--Doug >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > > > -- > ------------------------------------- > regards, mehrdad > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information