Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/05/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] IMGS: Boring Lens Tests
From: images at comporium.net (Tina Manley)
Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 09:14:12 -0400
References: <200905241933.BPM31749@rg4.comporium.net> <4A1A88C2.4000603@whitedogs.co.uk>
 
At 08:02 AM 5/25/2009, you wrote:
>Tina,
>
>given your reservations about the 35 1.2, and the fact that your 
>Noctilux looks to be pretty much on the money, will you start to use it 
>again?
>Some of your best film shots were taked with the Noctilux, and it's 
>a shame you don't appear to use it much with the M8.
>
>Mark Pope,


Absolutely.  I think it's probably true that the M8 is more demanding 
- showing up focusing flaws much more than film, but I've attached it 
to my M8 and plan to use it until I have confidence in it again.

Thanks, Mark.

Tina

Tina Manley
www.tinamanley.com
Replies: Reply from mark at whitedogs.co.uk (Mark Pope) ([Leica] IMGS: Boring Lens Tests)
Reply from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] IMGS: Boring Lens Tests)
Reply from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] IMGS: Boring Lens Tests)
 In reply to: Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] IMGS: Boring Lens Tests)
Message from mark at whitedogs.co.uk (Mark Pope) ([Leica] IMGS: Boring Lens Tests)