Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/07/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] The Leica M8.2 Experience
From: lug at steveunsworth.co.uk (Steve Unsworth)
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 19:23:18 +0100
 
Personally that's of no relevance. I used digital SLRs for years, but only
because there was no M equivalent. I'd rather pay more for a rangefinder
than for an SLR, just as with film I paid more for an M6 than and SLR, even
though it that case the 'sensor' in both cameras would have been identical.

Steve


On 14/7/09 17:50, "Richard Taylor" <r.s.taylor at comcast.net> wrote:

> The cost relative to film really isn't the point anymore.  It's the
> cost and performance compared to other digital options, such as the
> D700.
In reply to: Message from r.s.taylor at comcast.net (Richard Taylor) ([Leica] The Leica M8.2 Experience)