Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/08/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]2009-08-02-15:32:07 Tina Manley:
> If it is something I've never heard of like NAS, is there a tutorial?
Here's a quick definition of terms to get you started. I apologize in
advance if I get something wrong, because I'm just doing this from
memory instead of checking references.
RAID: Redundant Array of Inexpensive Disks (really!). A scheme to
take multiple disks and cobble them together in one of various ways to
look like a single disk, but with different size or reliability or
performance characteristics. Common RAID levels you might run across
are:
RAID-0: all the disks are stuck together to create one volume the
size of all the disks put together. Maximizes space and
performance, but at the cost of reliability. This is not what you
want to do to keep your photos as safe as possible. For example, a
RAID-0 set created from two identical disks would offer
approximately twice the space of one of the disks, potentially
nearly twice the speed of one disk, and very approximately half the
reliability of one of the disks. It's what was going on inside the
box of that 1T drive you had which was actually two 500G disks.
RAID-1: a mirror. Two disks (or other volumes, if you're cobbling
together a multi-level structure of structures) which each hold
identical data. When you write to the array, all data is written to
both, identically; when you read, if all is being done right,
if one is corrupted, somehow it's detected and you're supposed to
get just the good data. It's never been entirely clear to me how
this is done in practice, but presumably it works.
RAID-5: multiple disks in an array such that you get approximately
the usable storage of (number of disks - 1), and if one disk dies,
your data remains intact. Data and checksums are cleverly spread
around the disks so that all disks get about the same amount of
wear. Because of the mathematical data checksums used, I have
confidence in the integrity of data if all is implemented well.
You can use RAID-5 with three or more disks.
RAID-6: something I've only encountered in practice recently; it
allows you to burn two disks' capacity in the available storage
space in the array and gain the advantage that up to two drives may
fail and your data will remain intact. You're unlikely to be
interested in this unless you array is composed of six or more
disks.
NAS: Network Attached Storage. Just some pool of storage in a box
(usually implemented as a RAID array, but not necessarily) which,
instead of being attached directly to your computer to look like a
disk drive, is hung somewhere on your network. It presents volumes as
network fileshares which your computer mounts. With modern versions
of the popular operating systems (Mac OS X, Linux, Windows XP or
later) this can be a pretty convenient and reliable setup; with
decently fast networking (gigabit or faster wired ethernet), the
performance can be entirely acceptable.
The Infrant ReadyNAS boxes are sold specifically to be NAS. The Drobo
is sold to be direct-attached storage, but I believe they sell a
NASsifying adapter which would allow you to hang it on the network
instead.
SAN: Storage Area Network. It has many sophisticated attachment,
provisioning and replication characteristics which I don't begin to
understand properly. I currently have it filed in my brain as
something only a well-heeled corporation can afford to buy or
maintain.