Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/08/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?
From: jshul at comcast.net (Jim Shulman)
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:48:38 -0400
References: <C6A5EF2E.1621%lug@steveunsworth.co.uk> <2A1EF42A-81D3-4B79-A33B-40166BB45422@iisaka.com> <72B29F90-8891-45B7-BB22-E1A364EE952F@gmail.com> <36172e5a0908101431s5aa7ef03w345dfee62a79ef42@mail.gmail.com> <7ac27f4f0908101440g3af041cbxcf375988b5bf8211@mail.gmail.com>

If that's the case, I'll wait until Mr. K or some other manufacturer comes
out with a FF M-mount RF camera for half that amount (or less.)

Jim Shulman
Wynnewood, PA

Who figures that, at $5 per roll (with processing chemicals), he could shoot
1600 rolls of Efke 50/Tri-X/Plus-X for the price of one of the new FF Leica
cameras.  Or, at $17 per roll for Velvia with processing, he could shoot 470
rolls.  (This year I will probably shoot about 70 rolls of film.)  



-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+jshul=comcast.net at leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+jshul=comcast.net at leica-users.org] On Behalf Of 
Richard
Man
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 5:41 PM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?

People who know, can't say. People who heard, are saving their pennies :-)

Slightly larger than M8, no IR issues, 18-20 MP, full frame, About
$8000, delivery by end of the year or Feb 2010. My source is the horde
of gossiping poodles!

http://www.dragonsgate.net/pub/richard/PICS/L9991668.jpg

The idiotic thing about owning Leica is, when Nikon pulled that trick
($8000) with the D3X, they were ridiculed with Hilter, no less. But
with Leica? $8000 sounds almost like a good deal!!!



On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Geoff Hopkinson<hopsternew at gmail.com>
wrote:
> That ain't what I heard, Leo ;-)
> However rumours don't count until there is an actual announcement.
> One large Aussie dealer is (unofficially) quoting prices too.
> I'm amazed that so little of the M9 discussion has made it onto the LUG
thus
> far, everyone must be getting their gossip elsewhere.


-- 
// richard m: richard @imagecraft.com
// w: http://www.imagecraft.com/pub/Portfolio09/ blog:
http://rfman.wordpress.com
// book: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/detail/745963

_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
Reply from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
In reply to: Message from lug at steveunsworth.co.uk (Steve Unsworth) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
Message from ken at iisaka.com (Ken Iisaka) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
Message from leowesson at gmail.com (Leo Wesson) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
Message from richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)