Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2009/08/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Hasselblad digi-backs, lenses - was M9 „ M8
From: sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter)
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 11:06:46 -0500
References: <0D984AC4-A065-4311-A904-AA8B335CDDB1@mac.com> <C6AA7952.52D8C%mark@rabinergroup.com>
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 1:15 AM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com>
>
>
> What would be better than a contact print from an 8x10 neg?
I would say an 8x10 Polaroid print. No negative to get in the way.
;-)
Regards,
Sonny
http://www.sonc.com
http://sonc.stumbleupon.com/
Natchitoches, Louisiana
(+31.754164,-093.099080)
Replies:
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Hasselblad digi-backs, lenses - was M9 „ M8)
Reply from robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier) ([Leica] Hasselblad digi-backs, lenses - was M9 „ M8)
Reply from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] Hasselblad digi-backs, lenses - was M9 „ M8)
In reply to:
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Hasselblad digi-backs, lenses - was M9?M8)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Hasselblad digi-backs, lenses - was M9 ? M8)