Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/08/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> Yeah, if that Bessa III had a 105mm lens and did 6x9. > > 105mm f2. mmmmmmm > > I wouldn't even delay, I'd have my credit card out now. > > :-) > > ....Vick > One thing I will say about 6x7 though; at least in my opinion. As slides on the light table or contact sheets they appear 50 percent larger than 6x6's. For some rare optical phenomenon reason. A sheet of 6x6's you really feel like you need a loupe to really see them A sheet of 6x7's that feeling is minimal. You can just really see them. They just jump out at you. If there is a 6x6 on the light table too no one is going to bother looking at it. It becomes trivial in comparison. This to me the reason why Herb and Annie* went from 6x6 to 6x7. Other than I'm sure wanting nothing to do with that embarrassing old Zeiss hassy glass. * Leibovitz and Ritz Mark William Rabiner