Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/10/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] iso 100.000+??
From: grduprey at mchsi.com (grduprey at mchsi.com)
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 05:19:29 +0000
References: <23a0a61f0910211727j22c205e6k6594e6382ca9c0d6@mail.gmail.com> <440b792d0910211759v42bbb4deh802feadf3d60ef93@mail.gmail.com>
 
 
Why do we need iso 100,000?  I seem to remember we all got along just fine 
with iso 400 or 800.  Seems like just a race to see who can supply the 
highest iso before the next guy.


Gene

 -------------- Original message from mehrdad <msadat at gmail.com>: 
--------------


> i know with the m8 & m9 we are struggling with iso 1250, i guess when m12 
> is
> out leica will catch up with todays canon
> 
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 5:27 PM, simon jessurun wrote:
> 
> > http://www.dpreview.com/news/0910/09102001canon1d4.aspbest,simon
> > amsterdam
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
>  -------------------------------------
>  regards, mehrdad
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
Replies: Reply from alal at duke.poly.edu (A. Lal) ([Leica] iso 100.000+??)
Reply from clive.moss at gmail.com (Clive Moss) ([Leica] iso 100.000+??)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] iso 100.000+??)
Reply from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (Philippe Amard) ([Leica] iso 100.000+??)
Reply from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] iso 100.000+??)
 In reply to: Message from simon.apekop at gmail.com (simon jessurun) ([Leica] iso 100.000+??)
Message from msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad) ([Leica] iso 100.000+??)