Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/10/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Stock Photography
From: richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man)
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:40:27 -0700
References: <10904848.1256212204822.JavaMail.root@wamui-junio.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <C7062324.5700C%mark@rabinergroup.com> <7ac27f4f0910221239r6a8f5868ne869733e65307032@mail.gmail.com>

OK, I exaggerated, all of the 10 or 10+ megapixels 4/3 cameras are
included. The older ones with less than 10 MP are not.

On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Richard Man <richard.lists at gmail.com> 
wrote:
> Sadly for you 4/3 bigot:-) ALL of the 4/3 cameras are included.
>
> Now you're going to continue to say the list doesn't mean anything :-)
>
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> 
> wrote:
>>
>> The good list
>> http://www.alamy.com/contributors/stock-photography-rec-camera-list.asp
>> The D200 is on it I'm amazed!
>>
>> The bad list
>> http://www.alamy.com/contributors/stock-photography-unsuitable-camera.asp
>>
>> I cant tell if the 4/3's system has made the cut as I don't recognize the
>> camrea names.
>> Mark William Rabiner
>>
>

-- 
// richard m: richard @imagecraft.com
// w: http://www.imagecraft.com/pub/Portfolio09/ blog:
http://rfman.wordpress.com
// book: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/detail/745963


In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] Stock Photography)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Stock Photography)
Message from richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Stock Photography)