Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/10/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Jerry, I didn't know, is the M9 body still bigger than M8? Yes, I add your wish too, like the MP Saludos Lluis El 26/10/2009, a las 19:28, Jerry Justianto escribi?: > My wish list: > > 1. Nikon or Canon Sensor > 2. Wider and better ISO 50-6400, considering most of us have > summiluxes. > 3. Live-View > 4. Bigger LCD > 5. Sensor cleaner mechanism. > 6. Smaller body just like MP > > JSJ > > > On 10/27/09, Douglas Sharp <douglas.sharp at gmx.de> wrote: >> And a price reduction of about 1000 euros :-) >> Douglas >> >> Lluis Ripoll Querol wrote: >>> Nathan, as you say these are mostly importanty for the market that >>> than for me. >>> >>> ISO performence is always welcome but not a really need for me, I >>> prefer other facilities as: >>> >>> - Viewfinder at least 0,72x >>> - Sensor auto cleaning >>> - Block the selector, it is too easy to move it >>> >>> Saludos, >>> Lluis >>> >>> >>> El 26/10/2009, a las 18:58, Nathan Wajsman escribi?: >>> >>>> I can think of at least the following that would be included in a >>>> future M10: >>>> >>>> - better high ISO performance (whether or not at the cost of >>>> reducing >>>> pixel count must depend on the state of sensor technology in a >>>> couple >>>> of years) >>>> - a flip-out LCD with Live View >>>> - video capability >>>> - geo tagging and other snazzy features found on modern cameras >>>> - wifi or bluetooth or 3G/4G capability >>>> >>>> Not all of these are important to me personally (the first two >>>> are), >>>> but I can imagine that they are for the market. >>>> >>>> Nathan >>>> >>>> Nathan Wajsman >>>> Alicante, Spain >>>> http://www.frozenlight.eu >>>> http://www.greatpix.eu >>>> http://www.nathanfoto.com >>>> >>>> Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0 >>>> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws >>>> Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Oct 26, 2009, at 6:22 PM, Frank Dernie wrote: >>>> >>>>> For me the Leica M9 is spot on. They could have made it just for >>>>> me :-) >>>>> I, for one would not trade less resolution for higher iso, >>>>> though of >>>>> course higher iso would not be a retrograde step... >>>>> Frank >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Leica Users Group. >>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more >>>> information >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>> >> > > -- > Sent from my mobile device > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information